Anti-Israeli protestors take advantage of security lapse to infiltrate top UEFA dinner

0 View comments Anti-Israeli protesters took advantage of a security lapse to infiltrate a dinner for UEFA’s top officials in London.
Guests at the event – including David Beckham and Sir Alex Ferguson – were stunned as three people, two men and a woman, staged the protest against UEFA arranging its European Under-21 tournament in Israel next month.
One of the protesters jumped on the stage and started shouting slogans, while another stood behind UEFA president Michel Platini with a small flag, before all three were removed by security staff at the Old Billingsgate venue.
Proterst: Protesters march to the UEFA congress in London to protest against the U-21 European Championships in Israel – three even managed to get inside the building The dinner followed UEFA’s Congress in London and was organised with the support of the Football Association.
One guest, speaking on condition of anonymity, said: ‘It was between courses and suddenly this man and woman got on the stage and started shouting things against Israel.
Another had a flag and was standing behind Platini.
‘Everyone was gobsmacked.
It seemed to go on for a few minutes before they were removed.
‘It was a bit of a security lapse to say the least.
They were smartly dressed in suits but no one could understand how they had got in because we all had to show our invitations.’ Protesters from a group called Red Card Israeli Racism had also staged a demonstration outside the UEFA Congress in London’s Grosvenor House hotel earlier in the day.
It is the latest in a series of protests against UEFA – in January a group of pro-Palestinian activists occupied UEFA’s headquarters near Geneva.
Eight countries, including England, are taking part in the Under-21 tournament in Israel next month.
Bury future secure after chairman and directors quit ahead of takeover

Bury say the takeover at Gigg Lane will ‘allow wages, HMRC and loans obtained from the PFA to be fully repaid’.
Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian Bury’s future looks safe after a takeover which has seen the chairman, Brian Fenton, and board of directors resign with immediate effect.
The club announced in April that they needed 1m to survive.
The club, who were relegated from League One, said that the manager, Kevin Blackwell, will receive the backing of the incoming board members.
A statement on buryfc.co.uk read: “The paperwork for the takeover has been formally completed.
The board of directors have all resigned in order for new board members to be appointed during the next few days.
It is hoped that the paperwork can be concluded by 5pm on Wednesday 29 May.
This will allow wages, HMRC and loans obtained from the PFA to be fully repaid, and allow the club to move forward.
“The new board of directors will be bringing in key individuals to assist in bringing new ideas and business models to ensure the financial security of Bury Football Club moving forward.
“The new board of directors have met with Kevin Blackwell and support him 100% in his vision of returning Bury to the position it deserves.
The new board would like to thank Jim Lomas and Neville Neville for their support and hard work in assisting with the due diligence process.
Without their input this would not have been possible.”
Class President Suspended For Tweet Criticizing High School …
Thank goodness Twitter didn t exist when you were in high school, hmm? If you ve ever said or thought that, you ll appreciate the COMPLETE ridiculousness of this story.
A class president at a high school in Kansas said something negative about his school s football team and got suspended for the remainder of the year.
He didn t swear. He didn t threaten anyone.
The tweet wasn t violent. But it made other kids angry. Yeah, that s really all it took.
This is going on the Twit List1, definitely.
We know you re dying to know what he said in this high school career-ending tweet. Here it is:
Heights U is equivalent to WSU s football team
Wesley Teague (@Rolltide_Teague) May 2, 20132
Heights U is what players call themselves (not an official name) and WSU doesn t have a football team so neither exist. Oh, for the love of all things decent and moral what was he thinking to publicly make such a chilling comparison?!
Better question: What was the school thinking to suspend him?
According to the Huffington Post3, School officials said they suspended Teague for violating its student conduct code4, which prohibits cyberbullying, according to KSN-TV.
The comments got several underclassmen upset, and they wanted to fight him, USD 259 spokeswoman Susan Arensman told the station.
Some other students were suspended as well for trying to incite a disturbance at school.
So, THAT makes sense. Suspend the class president because jocks want to beat him up. Guess using your words is discouraged at Heights U.
Here he talking a bit more about it.
Do you think a suspension was the right way to go?(Image from Shutterstock)
References
- ^ Twit List (www.mediabistro.com)
- ^ May 2, 2013 (twitter.com)
- ^ Huffington Post (www.huffingtonpost.com)
- ^ suspended Teague for violating its student conduct code (www.ksn.com)
Pinhead Front and Rear Cycle Wheel and Seatpost Locking Security Skewers. 3 Pack Lock Set.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Find More Release Products
Agro-Libya: food, fishing and agriculture exhibition opens next week …
Libyan olives, dates and fish could help diversify the country s economy (Photo: Tom Westcott, Libya Herald)
Tripoli, 28 April 2013:
The sixth Agro-Libya exhibition will open at Tripoli International Fairground next Monday, with over 100 Libyan and international stands covering aspects of food, fishing and agriculture.
Besides oil, Libya offers excellent fish, olives and also dates, project manger for Agro-Libya, Rola Ajjawi, told the Libya Herald. She added that Libya s pure land, uncontaminated by modern fertilisers, offered great potential for future organic farming.
The exhibition, Ajjawi said, would include everything relating to agriculture, fishing and food.
This year, Agro-Libya will occupy three pavilions. One will be exclusively for Tunisian companies and two will feature stands from other international firms as well as Libyan organisations, which make up 20 percent of the exhibitors.
Two European and five international companies cancelled their stands last week because of security concerns following the car-bomb attack1 on the French embassy.
Agro-Libya will run from 6 to 9 May, with the opening ceremony at 6 pm on Monday 6 May.
For more information, see: http://www.agro-libya.com2/
More from Libya Herald..
Agro-Libya Food and Fishing Fair opens tomorrow
Tripoli, 6 May: The Agro-Libya Food and Fishing exhibition opens tomorrow and will run until 10 May at the Tripoli International Fairground.The exhibition will have a wide remit in all the agri…3
Machinery and Food and Packing shows in June
Tripoli, 16 May: Two exhibitions, the Third International Machinery Show and the Third International Food, Food Technologies, Packing and Plastics Show will be held simultaneously 4-7 June at the T…4
Minister of Economy Abufunas calls on companies to resume their stalled projects
By Sami Zaptia. Tripoli, 4 January: Economy Minister Mustafa Abufunas said that the economic sector needs priority in re-building. It was badly constrained in its ability to grow (by the previo…5
The Friends: Libya and Republic of Korea
Tripoli, 18 July: By Daeshik Jo, Ambassador of the Republic of Korea to Libya.In the early 1980s, I had just finished my military service and was preparing for an exam to enter the Ministry of …6
Government guarded on Ghadames clashes
- Election candidate shot in south – Transparency Authority to remove two NTC members.By Sami Zaptia.
Tripoli, 16 May: The official press conference was a rather shorter t…7
References
- ^ car-bomb attack (www.libyaherald.com)
- ^ http://www.agro-libya.com (www.agro-libya.com)
- ^ Agro-Libya Food and Fishing Fair opens tomorrow (www.libyaherald.com)
- ^ Machinery and Food and Packing shows in June (www.libyaherald.com)
- ^ Minister of Economy Abufunas calls on companies to resume their stalled projects (www.libyaherald.com)
- ^ The Friends: Libya and Republic of Korea (www.libyaherald.com)
- ^ Government guarded on Ghadames clashes (www.libyaherald.com)
FA to review policing at Wembley

The Football Association may change the way high-risk matches at Wembley are policed as part of the ongoing inquest into the serious unrest among Millwall fans that marred Saturday’s FA Cup semi-final against Wigan Athletic.
The FA general secretary, Alex Horne, said the scenes of bloody violence in the Millwall end unlikely to have been the image the FA wanted to project to the world in a week when it claimed the competition had been fully revived were “deplorable”.
He vowed to work with police to review the events, which resulted in 14 people being arrested (12 Millwall fans and two Wigan fans), including six for affray.
Police said there would be a “significant post- match review” to identify any further offenders.
But while it may reasonably argue that no one could have predicted that the Millwall fans would turn on each other, the FA will also face questions of its own over the kick-off time and the apparent delay in police officers arriving on the scene as the situation smouldered for over half an hour during the second half.
The Millwall Supporters Club, whose secretary, Graeme Smale, said he was “devastated” that the actions of a small minority had again blighted the club, also raised questions over the 5.15pm kick-off time and the number of drunken fans present.
The kick off time for the semi-final was lauded by Horne earlier this week because it increased television audiences.
But according to Smale, it also vastly increased the number of inebriated fans.
“Some of these people go to the pub at 10am and get blind drunk.
What are they doing in the ground?” he said.
As behaviour within football grounds has improved over the past two decades, stewards have tended to replace police officers.
But the stewards, who are not trained security guards, are told to hang back if an incident escalates into a “public order offence”.
So while they may deal with persistent standing or obscene language they will be ordered to stand back and wait for the police, if violence is involved.
Given the endless images of the 1980s that have filled screens and newspapers since the death of the former prime minister Margaret Thatcher was announced on Monday, it was tempting to view scenes of fans exchanging blows and causing serious injury as of another era.
But for all the club’s attempts to overhaul its image and drive out the elements of its fanbase that have damaged its reputation down the years, with measures ranging from its impressive community schemes and charitable trust to practical steps like membership schemes and banning orders, their efforts have been undermined.
While a long way from the dark days of the 1980s, most infamously the riot involving Millwall fans at Luton’s Kenilworth Road that led to Thatcher’s ID card proposals, periodic outbreaks of violence and disorder have continued to blight the club since particularly for high-profile clashes against bitter rivals.
In 2009 there were running battles inside and outside Upton Park before and during a League Cup tie between West Ham and Millwall that prompted a similar bout of soul-searching over what more the club could do to rid itself of the sizeable minority who revel in a reputation for violence.
It may have to be more condemnatory in its public statements than the tone suggested by its American chairman, John Berylson, a former US marine turned venture capitalist estimated to have pumped more than 16m into the club.
“There are always a few idiots.
That’s not our fan-base and we don’t even know who those people are.
We will be investigating,” said Berylson.
Although he also referred to them as a “mindless minority”, the chief executive, Andy Ambler, was more explicit.
“Our position is clear.
Anyone associated with our club found guilty of violent behaviour will be banned indefinitely from Millwall matches in addition to any punishment they receive from the authorities,” he said.
Yesterday the sports minister, Hugh Robertson, added: “The scenes in the Millwall end yesterday at Wembley involving a minority of so-called fans were deplorable.
The perpetrators have absolutely no place in the game.
It is right that the Metropolitan Police and the FA are conducting a full investigation.
I also welcome Millwall Football Club’s position that anyone found guilty of violent behaviour will be banned indefinitely from Millwall matches.” Millwall fans, many of whom were booing those involved in the trouble, have since been caught in the familiar bind of trying to condemn the perpetrators while defending their club from the inevitable onslaught of criticism.
“I’m devastated by it.
These idiots have used us as a convenient vehicle.
We want to get rid of these individuals, who have to take responsibility for their own actions.
They are no good to us whatsoever,” said Smale, who said Millwall were doing everything possible to shake off a rogue element which attached itself to the club for big matches but rarely went to regular League games.
“These people treat Millwall like an old fag packet,” he added.
“They want to misbehave.
They are there for a reason, they are nothing to do with the football club.” Coupled with the result, it certainly took the sheen off what should have been a memorable day at Wembley for the club.
“No players want that to happen,” said Millwall’s captain, Danny Shittu.
“It was supposed to be a happy day, regardless of the result it was meant to be good day out at Wembley.
“I’m disappointed by it but as players we just have to keep doing what we do.
At the end so many supporters showed they were there just to spur us on but it’s disappointing to hear about such things happening on a day like that.
“It’s a small minority but things like that should not be happening.
It should have been a great day for both sides.” It should have been the biggest day of young defender Shane Lowry’s life.
The 23-year-old Australian said: “Sometimes you get a minority, but we brought almost 32,000 fans and the majority were fantastic.
They outsung the Wigan fans and backed us throughout the whole game.
“It’s disappointing to see incidents like that but the majority of fans have been fantastic this season.” While the majority of the 31,500 tickets allocated to Millwall fans were sold to season ticket holders, who were each allowed to buy two extra tickets, and members, who were allowed to buy one additional ticket,a small number are believed to have gone on general sale.
FA finds no evidence of fans’ racism

Chanting during England’s game in San Marino led Football Against Racism in Europe to submit an official complaint to Fifa.
Photograph: Carl Recine/Action Images The Football Association has written to Fifa to say it has found no evidence of racist chanting by England fans directed at the Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand and his brother Anton during last month’s World Cup qualifier against San Marino but did not dispute that it had taken place.
The Football Against Racism in Europe group submitted an official complaint to Fifa over chants from England fans that included “build a bonfire, build a bonfire, put Rio on the top, put Anton in the middle, then burn the fucking lot”, which it highlighted as the most offensive.
Club England’s managing director, Adrian Bevington, said the FA was not disputing that the chanting reported by several journalists who were present took place but that it had not been able to identify any of the culprits.
“We’ve been asked to supply our submission to Fifa by Tuesday, which we will do,” said Bevington.
“We have gone through all of the video evidence that our security team recorded on the evening of the game.
I do want to make clear that, while the journalists who have reported this have done so in good faith, they clearly have heard some chanting of a particular nature and we’re not disputing that, but we haven’t been able to identify any of that from the recorded evidence that we’ve gone through.” Ferdinand was vilified by some sections of the England support after withdrawing from Roy Hodgson’s squad because the schedule was not compatible with his pre-planned fitness regime, before flying to Qatar to work as a pundit for Al Jazeera.
Fifa will decide whether to take action against the FA after reviewing its letter and any other evidence.
“Both Fare and members of the media have a duty to report such matters and we fully support them in their right to do so,” said Bevington.
“I want to be clear I am not calling into question the integrity of any journalist who reported what they had heard in good faith.
We have to ensure an environment exists where anyone is able to report their concerns to us, be those players, supporters or the media.” In the wake of the furore the FA said it recognised it must “continue to address any issues that arise involving our own supporters in the same manner we expect other nations to do so.” “We will continue to take every possible measure to ensure our supporters conduct themselves appropriately, as most have over the past decade,” said Bevington after the original reports.
“However, we will not accept any racist chanting and we also call on those attending England matches at home and abroad to stop the ‘No Surrender’ chanting during the singing of the national anthem, both before and during games.
We have made significant progress following the hooliganism that blighted the national team in 1998 and 2000.
We must continue to maintain this hard work.” Ferdinand said on his Twitter account in the wake of the incident: “You expect+accept banter from fans on the terraces as its part of what makes the game great,but racism is not banter,& from ya own fans.
WOW” He added: “Always a small minority who ruin it for others.
Let’s not jump to conclusions + assume though as it might just have been banter.
We’ll see after the investigation.”
No evidence Rio Ferdinand was racially abused by England fans during World Cup qualifier in San Marino, say Football Association

By , and | The Football Association has found no evidence of alleged racist chanting about Rio and Anton Ferdinand during England’s World Cup qualifier in San Marino last month.
The European anti-racism body Football Against Racism in Europe (Fare) complained to Fifa after reports of offensive songs by England supporters during the 8-0 win in Serravalle on March 22.
However, while it does not dispute the reports, the FA has failed to find any proof.
Scroll down for video Accused: England supporters have been reported for chants about the Ferdinand brothers – THERE IS NO SUGGESTION THAT THOSE PICTURED WERE INVOLVED The FA statement at the time The FA takes all incidents and allegations of racism extremely seriously.
In San Marino, we had FA security officers monitoring the English supporters in the stadium.
This includes recorded video footage.
We also worked closely with UK Police in advance of and on the night of the game.
While we have no reason to dispute the media reports which are without doubt made for the right reasons of fighting racism, at this time we have not found any recorded evidence of the specific discriminatory chanting referring to Rio and Anton Ferdinand and the vile ‘bonfire’ song.
We will of course continue to review all of our recorded footage.
We recognise the importance of FARE’s responsibility to report any incidents to FIFA.
We will liaise with FIFA and work with them to assist any investigation.
Should evidence of any racial chanting be found, we would expect action to be taken against any individuals.
The FA would terminate englandfans membership of any guilty members, while we would expect banning orders to be issued by the courts as a minimum penalty.
We do not want supporters who chant vile or racist abuse following the England team.
The FA will continue to work closely with Kick it Out and FARE to ensure we do all we can to eradicate racism from football.
We fully recognise that we must continue to address any issues that arise involving our own supporters in the same manner we expect other nations to do so.
We should also make clear that in addition to the officially ticketed englandfans in San Marino, there was also a large number of non-members who did not receive tickets through the FA.
As is normal practice for England senior away fixtures, the FA had full-time staff and security managing the collection of tickets for the games in San Marino and Montenegro.
We also made specific arrangements in Montenegro for official supporters to be issued with wristbands on collection of their tickets.
The FA has a stringent approach to ticketing and security, working closely with UK Police and other UK agencies.
We will continue to take every possible measure to ensure our supporters conduct themselves appropriately, as most have over the past decade.
However, we will not accept any racist chanting and we also call on those attending England matches at home and abroad to stop the ‘No Surrender’ chanting during the singing of the national anthem, both before and during games.
We have made significant progress following the hooliganism that blighted the national team in 1998 and 2000.
We must continue to maintain this hard work.
‘We’ve been asked to supply our submission to Fifa by Tuesday, which we will do,’ said FA Managing Director of Club England Adrian Bevington.
‘We have gone through all of the video evidence that our security team recorded on the evening of the game.
‘I do want to make clear that while the journalists who have reported this have done so in good faith, they clearly have heard chanting of a particular nature, and we’re not disputing that, but we haven’t been able to identify any of that from the recorded evidence that we’ve gone through.’ Fare, who did not have their own observers at the match, have collated the evidence on the basis of ‘hearsay’, according to the Football Supporters Federation.
Having been selected for an England squad for the first time since June 2011 for the Brazil 2014 qualifying double-header with San Marino and Montenegro, Ferdinand withdrew after telling Roy Hodgson he had to follow a pre-planned programme of treatment on his back trouble.
He then attracted ridicule by flying to Qatar to appear as a pundit for the match on the Al-Jazeera television channel.
It was widely reported the morning after the game that England fans had sung derogatory songs about Rio and his brother Anton, with the FA promising to investigate the claims.
Ferdinand said on Twitter at the time: ‘You expect and accept banter from fans on the terraces as it’s part of what makes the game great, but racism is not banter and from your own fans.
WOW.
‘Always a small minority who ruin it for others.’ He added: ‘Let’s not jump to conclusions and assume though as it might just have been banter.
We’ll see after the investigation.’ The FA issued a statement confirming they had launched an investigation and would review video footage taken by their officials.
They also promised to ban any England fan found guilty of racist abuse and vowed to ‘do all we can to eradicate racism from football’.
And the FA also issued a strong call for an end to the ‘No Surrender’ chants.
The statement read: ‘We will not accept any racist chanting and we also call on those attending England matches at home and abroad to stop the “No Surrender” chanting during the singing of the national anthem, both before and during games.’ The prospect of Fifa sanctions was then raised after Fare flagged up to world football’s governing body the vile songs which suggested the pair be burned on a bonfire.
The chant in San Marino was: ‘Build a bonfire, build a bonfire, put Rio on the top, put Anton in the middle, then burn the f****** lot.’ Football Supporters Federation chief executive Kevin Miles, who was at the game, said: Leaping to formal complaint on the basis of second-hand and hearsay information without engaging with supporters organisations who were present or the FA is not an approach designed to create the best possible outcome.
The Football Supporters Federation stand firmly against any manifestations of racism within football.
On this occasion, I personally have not heard any of the anti-Rio Ferdinand sentiment being expressed in a way that could be construed as racist.
Anger about Rio Ferdinand’s absence from the squad and presence in Dubai in an Al Jazeera studio was strongly felt and clearly expressed.
But I heard no racist content.
If there were songs sung with racist undertones, then that is a matter for concern.
But even then the response needs to be measured, proportionate and constructive.
Kick It Out chairman Lord Ouseley today called at the time on the FA to take a stance on the ‘vile’ and ‘abusive’ chants by England fans aimed at the Ferdinands.
It has been suggested the song had racist overtones because Anton Ferdinand was the target of racist abuse from former England captain John Terry.
Abuse: England supporters chanted that Rio (above) and Anton Ferdinand (below left) should be ‘burned’ Who are FARE? Football Against Racism in Europe (FARE) is an international network of groups active in over 40 countries.
Their aim is to help support and coordinate efforts across borders and strengthen activity at national level.
According to their mission statement: We want to see the beautiful game played without discrimination and used as a social tool to unite communities, overcome exclusion and create social change.
‘Our focus is on tackling racism of all kinds, homophobia, and to empower minorities and women to realise their personal and collective potential.’ The general objectives of the FARE network are: To promote a commitment to fight discrimination at all levels of football across Europe in stadiums, on the pitch, in administration, in coaching and sport education and through the media Use the appeal of football to tackle societal discrimination To foster networking and exchange of good practice transnationally To undertake activities to capacity build and empower marginalized and discriminated groups, in particular young people, migrants, ethnic minorities, members of the LGBT communities and women.
Where do they get their money from? Funding has come from the European Commission, UEFA and smaller bodies such as Stand Up Speak Up, a campaign launched by Thierry Henry and Nike to fight racism.
Did FARE have anyone at the match? No.
They operate as a conduit for complaints of racism.
So why are they getting involved? Despite having no direct experience of the chanting, FARE claim they are duty bound to lodge a complaint after collating evidence sent to them and after studying media reports of the match.
And why do they think the chant was racist? That is far from clear.
The bonfire song is sung at football stadiums across Britain without any suggestions of racism.
Some suggest the inclusion of Anton Ferdinand as well as his brother Rio has turned the song into a racist attack.
FARE have talked only of an undercurrent of race .
Others point to connotations of the Ku Klux Klan.
What happens next? FIFA will assess the complaint next week.
If the allegations are proved it is possible, but unlikely, that England could end up being forced to play their next match behind closed doors.
Hungary and Bulgaria played in empty stadiums as a result of FIFA punishments.
Ouseley told BBC Radio 5 Live: ‘Whether it’s racist or not, it’s certainly unacceptable.
It’s vile and it shouldn’t be part of sport.
Something needs to be done about it.
‘These are the supporters of the England national team who are travelling abroad and singing songs like that.
What messages does it send out about the type of people we are and who we represent? ‘The Football Association should be taking a stance on this about the people it wants supporting the England team, the image it wants to send abroad.
‘I’ve already contacted the chairman of the Football Association and said this has to be looked at, investigated and dealt with.
Do you want to be having an army of fans who call themselves the England fans travelling abroad, being abusive to their own players like that, or indeed other people? ‘FIFA will determine (whether it is racist) but clearly we can take a stance on that.
We have policies on anti-racism, homophobia and all other forms of unacceptable behaviour.
Why are we so quiet about it?’ FIFA said in a statement: ‘We can confirm that FIFA has been contacted by FARE regarding the FIFA World Cup qualifier match between San Marino and England last Friday.
‘FIFA will now analyse the content of the documents and next steps will be determined in due course.’ The ultimate sanction, if FIFA take action against England, is playing a World Cup qualifier behind closed doors.
FARE, headed by Piara Powar, did not have observers at the game as it was not expected to be ‘high risk’, but were supplied with information about the chants by people who were and they have decided to act.
The organisation is a pan-European network that aims to rid racism from football.
They also reported racist or xenophobic incidents at Croatia v Serbia and Poland v Ukraine, matches where members were present.
The FA did not know an official complaint had been made when Sportsmail enquired but they are aware of the songs.
English fans also sang about the IRA and ‘German bombers’ during the World Cup qualifier but FARE made it clear the Ferdinand chanting was the reason FIFA had been notified.
A FARE spokeswoman said: ‘It refers to the racist abuse Rio Ferdinand received, along with his brother Anton.
‘We don’t make the judgement.
We send a report to FIFA but in the end its their decision whether they open proceedings or not.
And whether they issue a fine or not.’ An FA spokesman said: ‘We have not been notified on this matter and until we get a full report it would not be appropriate to say anything.’ Powar told Sportsmail : It’s not really the sort of thing we are generally attuned to looking at fans abusing players of their own country who may not have been picked.
‘Nevertheless if it happens at a game, even if the focus of the abuse isn t there it’s still happening.
One of the things we want to underline straight off is that sometimes racism doesn t only take the form of monkey chants or bananas being thrown.
Sometimes there are things that are more subtle at play.
In the end we are not responsible for making a decision on whether England fans are guilty of racism here but we do have a duty to report things that are said to us because individuals have reported them as racist or xenophobic within the context.’ Pulled out: Man United defender Ferdinand was called up but withdrew from Roy Hodgson’s squad He added: If someone says to us, We think this is a big issue , and there doesn t seem to be malicious intent from their perspective then we are obliged to report it.
‘We have people who look at this stuff and they have a fairly clear idea of the standards required by governing bodies.
‘It’s then put to them and it’s their process.
In this case it’s FIFA’s process.
They see whether the evidence hits the standard to take forward a prosecution.
‘FIFA, in the last couple of incidents they ve dealt with, have shown a stronger side.
They banned Hungary and Bulgaria from playing with fans last Friday.
Forced them to play behind closed doors.
‘That’s quite rare to have a major tournament qualifier behind closed doors.
The last two incidents we reported FIFA showed a very strong hand.’ FARE feel the use of the You know what you are chant also has a racial element, given the history of the chant in the Terry case.
Peter Herbert, chairman of the Society for Black Lawyers, insists the bonfire chant does have racist overtones, adding: We re uncovering a hard core of racist fans out there and it doesn t take very much to trigger their abuse.
Some England fans, in that sense, would claim the Ku Klux Klan are not racist.
I think anybody with any sense and understanding of how racism operates will see that this is clearly racially motivated and is directed at him.
It would not have been said if it had been a white footballer in the same situation.
Oxford win 159th Boat Race

The 159th Boat Race: Oxford beat Cambridge by a length and a half Oxford gained revenge for last year’s defeat with victory in the 159th annual university Boat Race.
The Dark Blues, who won the toss and opted for the Surrey station, surged to victory in the 4.2-mile race by a length and a half.
The Oxford crew, which contained two members of the Team GB 2012 rowing team, made a strong start and finally broke a spirited Cambridge effort just as the river turned towards the finish at Barnes Bridge.
The victory trims Cambridge’s overall lead in the event to 81-77.
There was tight security along the banks of the Thames following last year’s restart after Australian Trenton Oldfield swam into the path of the two boats in a protest against elitism and government cuts.
He was released from prison in December after serving seven weeks of a six-month sentence for causing a public nuisance.




Recent Comments